"“You have a husband, madame?"
“I have.”
“Children?”
“No children.”"(p.188)
(First and foremost, I apologize for my confusing citation) That being said, in these two excerpts (especially the second) I am reminded that the Defarges are a barren couple with no (real) children to speak of. Because of this, they are in a way, parenting their figurative child which is the French Revolution. They gave birth to the design of the movement, they raised it by spreading word among the Jaques's, essentially they have done all for the Revolution as parents would for their children.
Madame Defarge is portrayed as the classical devoted, caring, and nurturing mother (the only difference being that her child is the intangible concept of revolution). As seen in my first citation, she is ready and willing to give her all to see her child excel regardless of time and energy spent on the task (kind of reminds me of my mom...).
Another tidbit I found interesting is the hit-list Madame Defarge is knitting. For a actual mother with a living child, knitting is one way she provides for her youngster. By knitting the "registered ones" onto her work, she is in a way "feeding" her baby by providing it with the nourishment (the lives of the nobles and all that are affiliated with them) that it will need to grow and flourish, which has a double meaning since while the Child thrives, the world around it crumbles.
What I find very ironic of this metaphorical mother-"child" relationship however is that, in most situations, the parent strives to give every last ounce of his/her vitality to see the child lead a prosperous life (Ideally, parents give life to their children, both by giving birth and also by raising them). Though Madame Defarge is wholly committed to giving life to her "child", the life of her infant revolution will bring about much death, chaos, and adversity in France.
1 comment:
I agree with everything you have said here. I never really realized Madame Defarge could be kindhearted, but that goes for all parents. However, I don't really understand the 2nd citation and how it supports your statement. Is it supposed to?
Post a Comment